vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.1× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 7.5%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
SGI vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $140.8M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 54.7% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.8% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.8M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.4M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.1M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.1M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.0% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.9% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.9% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.47 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $559.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.5M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.8M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.92× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.4M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $633.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.4M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.2M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.1M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.4M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.6M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $360.3M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.4M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.2M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.30× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.97× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |