vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN) and TEJON RANCH CO (TRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEJON RANCH CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.1M vs $12.5M, roughly 1.7× SOLESENCE, INC.). TEJON RANCH CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 1.3%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEJON RANCH CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, TEJON RANCH CO's revenue compounded faster (68.8% CAGR vs 12.5%).
Tejon Ranch Company, based in Lebec, California, is one of the largest private landowners in California. The company was incorporated in 1936 to organize the ownership of a large tract of land that was consolidated from four Mexican land grants acquired in the 1850s and 1860s by ranch founder Edward Fitzgerald Beale.
SLSN vs TRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $163.0K | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.2% | -64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $163.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-559.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.0K | $957.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $893.0K | $-914.0K |
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.2% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.4% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | -48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -50.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -62.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | -53.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | -12.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $9.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6M | $475.2M |
| Total Assets | $50.1M | $630.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $471.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $472.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $473.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2M | $468.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $469.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $467.4M |
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $630.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0M | $629.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.0M | $618.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $614.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $608.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $598.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $590.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $581.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8M | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.16× | 3.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-654.0K | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-565.0K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $777.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-404.0K | $-42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -122.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -240.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -230.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | -239.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -155.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.0% | -277.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.9% | -99.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 102.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 236.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 213.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 319.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 174.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 245.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 109.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.16× | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -90.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.66× | -1.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
