vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($124.7M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.0× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -3.9%). SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.3M vs $9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
SPT vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.9M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.9M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.6M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.8M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.3M | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.1M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.6M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $159.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.8M | $137.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.6M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 77.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.3% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.4% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.8% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $203.4M | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $523.1M | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.4M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.2M | $47.4M |
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.1M | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.6M | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.3M | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.6M | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.1M | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $399.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.3M | $376.4M |
| Q4 25 | $523.1M | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.4M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $422.9M | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.7M | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.3M | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.8M | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.6M | $577.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.9M | $570.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.9M | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.9M | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $39.3M | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
