vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.6× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -16.4%, a 22.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs -7.5%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $-31.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
STRZ vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | $425.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $394.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $814.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $856.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | $262.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $252.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-42.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | 1.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
