vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.6× SILVERCORP METALS INC). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -1.3%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
SVM vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |