vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($334.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.5× SILVERCORP METALS INC). SILVERCORP METALS INC runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -18.0%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
SVM vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
