vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT) and TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC (TCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.1M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.1× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc. (TCI) is a U.S.-based real estate investment firm that owns, operates and develops a diversified portfolio of residential, commercial and mixed-use properties across core U.S. regional markets. It pursues long-term value growth via strategic property acquisitions, efficient asset management and tailored leasing solutions for individual and business tenants.
TACT vs TCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $12.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.1% | -28.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 68.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7577.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0K | $724.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-143.0K | $169.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0K | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-551.0K | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-319.0K | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | 47.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.1% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.4M | $89.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $210.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $31.1M | $846.7M |
| Total Assets | $44.8M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | $89.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.7M | $73.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $88.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $99.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $130.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $210.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $223.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $212.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $198.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $180.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $178.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $846.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.8M | $838.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.3M | $837.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $837.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.6M | $832.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | $832.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $830.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.6M | $828.9M |
| Q4 25 | $44.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $609.0K | $-2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $589.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $609.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-161.0K | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.0K | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.0K | $-511.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $589.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-171.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $499.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 242.00× | 11.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.47× | -1.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
