vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI) and VERRA MOBILITY Corp (VRRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $257.9M, roughly 1.3× VERRA MOBILITY Corp). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 7.3%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VERRA MOBILITY Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.4% vs 15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, VERRA MOBILITY Corp's revenue compounded faster (10.9% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
Verra Mobility Corp is a leading global smart mobility technology solution provider. It delivers toll management, parking and traffic compliance enforcement, connected vehicle services, and fleet management tools, serving government transport agencies, rental car operators, commercial fleet owners, and automotive partners across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
TCBI vs VRRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $324.0M | $257.9M |
| Net Profit | $73.8M | $18.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.5% | 16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 56.8% | 128.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $324.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $327.5M | $257.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.4M | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $307.5M | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | $223.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $229.6M | $221.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.3M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.0M | $222.4M |
| Q1 26 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.7M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.2M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $-66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-61.3M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.7M | $34.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -63.8% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.9% | -30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -48.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.18 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.58 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.92 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.43 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.41 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $65.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $878.3M | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $293.0M |
| Total Assets | $33.5B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 3.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $147.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.0M |
| Q1 26 | $878.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $620.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $620.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $620.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $660.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $660.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $352.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $486.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $438.6M |
| Q1 26 | $33.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | 3.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | 2.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $40.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $136.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.2M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.3M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0M | $75.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $368.0K | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $480.1M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.8M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $347.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $415.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.6M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 106.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 253.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.58× | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.58× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.76× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.80× | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TCBI
Segment breakdown not available.
VRRM
| Services | $239.5M | 93% |
| CA | $8.4M | 3% |
| GB | $5.7M | 2% |
| Other Customer | $1.6M | 1% |
| Parking Solutions | $1.1M | 0% |
