vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.5× INTERFACE INC). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -9.3%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $28.6M).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
TIC vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $508.3M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -9.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $508.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.9M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.9M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-233.0K | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.5M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $439.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.1M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.3M | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $752.4M | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.7M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.1M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.3% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $61.3M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
