vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERFACE INC (TILE) and UDR, Inc. (UDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UDR, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.8M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.2× INTERFACE INC). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 44.6% vs 7.0%, a 37.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
UDR, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality multifamily residential apartment communities. It operates across major U.S. metropolitan markets, catering to a diverse tenant base including young professionals, families, and middle-to-high income households.
TILE vs UDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.4M | $425.8M |
| Net Profit | $24.4M | $189.8M |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 54.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 44.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | 147.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | $433.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.5M | $431.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $425.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.4M | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.0M | $422.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.3M | $420.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.6M | $415.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $222.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -220.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.3M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $181.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $640.7M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $10.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.2M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.8M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.4M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.9M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.8M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.6M | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $640.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.2M | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 1.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $902.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.7M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.2M | $230.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $238.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | $627.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $171.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 150.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 148.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 41.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 5.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 6.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | 10.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 8.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
UDR
| Rental income | $423.3M | 99% |
| Joint venture management and other fees | $2.5M | 1% |
