vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERFACE INC (TILE) and TRUPANION, INC. (TRUP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRUPANION, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($376.9M vs $331.0M, roughly 1.1× INTERFACE INC). On growth, TRUPANION, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, TRUPANION, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
TRUPANION, INC.TRUPEarnings & Financial Report
Trupanion, Inc. is a pet insurance provider headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Established in 1998, Trupanion operates across the United States, Canada, Australia, and Puerto Rico. The company offers coverage for pets and is self-underwritten by the American Pet Insurance Company (APIC).
TILE vs TRUP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $331.0M | $376.9M |
| Net Profit | $23.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 1.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 81.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.40 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | $376.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.5M | $366.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $353.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.4M | $342.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.0M | $337.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.3M | $327.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.6M | $314.8M |
| Q1 26 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | 12.8% |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | -1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.2M | $370.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $196.5M | $101.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $634.6M | $383.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $915.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.3M | $370.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4M | $348.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $319.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $321.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $307.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $293.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.2M | $277.2M |
| Q1 26 | $196.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.8M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $634.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $640.7M | $383.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $368.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.0M | $355.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $333.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.1M | $323.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.6M | $320.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.2M | $305.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $915.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $880.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $847.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $837.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $806.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $816.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $795.9M |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $29.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $25.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.7M | $29.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.2M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $6.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $4.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
TRUP
| Subscriptionbusiness | $261.4M | 69% |
| Other | $115.4M | 31% |
