vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Urban Edge Properties (UE) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.2× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -0.7%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs -4.4%).
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
UE vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.6M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $22.6M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.1% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.2% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $132.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.6M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.1M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.1M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.5M | $123.7M |
| Q1 26 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $7.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.0M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.8M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.0M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.9M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6M | $271.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $665.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.1M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.73× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $182.7M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $21.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 84.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 95.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
