vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $341.0M, roughly 1.8× Utz Brands, Inc.). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 0.7%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -3.1%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $16.5M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
UTZ vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $341.0M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.3M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.3% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.5M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.2M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $346.5M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.5% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.1M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $768.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $696.9M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.9M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.0M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $797.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $756.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $696.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $685.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $671.1M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.2M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.5M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 23.67× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.1M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.1M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.3M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.7M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.5% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.67× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.