vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) and WEST BANCORPORATION INC (WTBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEST BANCORPORATION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $17.3M, roughly 1.6× Valens Semiconductor Ltd.). WEST BANCORPORATION INC runs the higher net margin — 39.2% vs -42.2%, a 81.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WEST BANCORPORATION INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 8.1%). WEST BANCORPORATION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.4M vs $-4.9M).
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
West Bancorporation Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Midwest, primarily serving markets across Iowa and Minnesota. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, business lending, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small-to-medium enterprises, and local organizational clients.
VLN vs WTBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.3M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 63.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -46.4% | 50.0% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | 39.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 29.3% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.9M | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -46.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -76.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.2% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -42.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.4% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -64.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.2% | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $93.5M | $362.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.8M | $270.7M |
| Total Assets | $136.7M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $471.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.5M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.7M | $345.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.8M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.5M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.6M | $237.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.0M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $223.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.8M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.8M | $4.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.9M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -28.5% | 46.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.0M | $79.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-211.0K | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-225.0K | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-330.0K | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-460.0K | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.3% | 35.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 125.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
