vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.0× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). Walker & Dunlop, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -12.9% vs -18.0%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -0.6%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($136.0M vs $-680.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
WD vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $340.0M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $-13.9M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.2% | -11.4% |
| Net Margin | -12.9% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.4% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -131.0% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.41 | $-0.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $340.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.7M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.2M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.4M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.5M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.3M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.7M | $367.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | $305.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.9M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.5M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.8M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $86.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.9M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | -17.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 16.4% |
| Q4 25 | -12.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.41 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.98 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.32 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.35 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $299.3M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $299.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.7M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $279.3M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.5M | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $623.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $674.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-664.3M | $152.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-680.1M | $136.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -200.0% | 40.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.2B | $321.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-664.3M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-948.1M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-238.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-281.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-202.0M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-237.8M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-680.1M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-950.4M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-241.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-284.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-204.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-241.7M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $67.0M |
| Q4 25 | -200.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -281.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -75.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -120.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -89.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 22.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.34× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.02× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | -102.07× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.89× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.01× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.49× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.24× | 4.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.