vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($677.3M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.3× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 6.1%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 21.4%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $6.6M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
WTS vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $677.3M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $99.6M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 48.1% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 14.7% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.6% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.97 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $677.3M | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $625.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $611.7M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $643.7M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $558.0M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.4M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $543.6M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $597.3M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | $99.6M | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.5M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.1M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.0M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | 48.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.6% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.8% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.3% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.7% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | 14.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $2.97 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.45 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.01 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.21 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.02 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.06 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.44 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $374.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $197.8M | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $374.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $405.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $369.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $197.8M | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.09× | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.9M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.6M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.0% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $317.3M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $17.9M | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $154.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.4M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.7M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.7M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.3M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | $6.6M | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.5M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.18× | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.07× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.04× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
WTS
| segment net | $517.8M | 76% |
| Other | $159.5M | 24% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
