vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.8× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co runs the higher net margin — -195.0% vs -697.1%, a 502.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
ABAT vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
