vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ulta Beauty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.0× AECOM). Ulta Beauty runs the higher net margin — 9.1% vs 1.9%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ulta Beauty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Ulta Beauty's revenue compounded faster (4.7% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
ACM vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $356.7M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 9.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $8.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $305.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $313.1M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | 38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 39.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | $8.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $6.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $6.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $494.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $62.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $494.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $454.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $524.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $62.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 11.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $68.3M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | 4.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
