vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.5× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -20.7%, a 52.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs -0.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs -3.0%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
AMH vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $404.4M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $560.9M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $55.3M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
