vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Andersons, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($329.5M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.5× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 20.5%, a 632.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -2.4%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $-77.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -1.8%).
The Andersons, Inc. is an American agribusiness established in 1947, that began as Andersons Truck Terminal (ATT) in the 1940s for the grain industry, headquartered in Maumee, Ohio. It is a diversified company rooted in agriculture that conducts business in the commodity merchandising, renewables, and plant nutrient sectors.
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
ANDE vs CATY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $329.5M | $222.8M |
| Net Profit | $67.4M | $90.5M |
| Gross Margin | 70.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 653.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $329.5M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $295.8M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.0M | $196.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.8M | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.5M | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.9M | $189.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $492.5M | $178.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $341.4M | $175.2M |
| Q4 25 | $67.4M | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.0K | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.1M | $80.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $71.4M |
| Q4 25 | 70.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | 653.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 587.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 40.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $1.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.23 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.31 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.16 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $98.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $560.0M | $119.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $24.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $98.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $561.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $560.0M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $608.2M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $23.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.2M | $368.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-77.1M | $363.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -23.4% | 163.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.5% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.09× | 4.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-56.1M | $672.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | $368.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.9M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $299.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-350.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.8M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $304.4M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-239.6M | $88.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-77.1M | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.5M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-396.6M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.9M | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.8M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-266.4M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | -23.4% | 163.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.5% | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.8% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.9% | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 174.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.0% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -78.0% | 49.8% |
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.09× | 4.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.61× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.10× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1232.46× | 1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.96× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.08× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.46× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.94× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANDE
| Specialty And Primary Nutrients | $137.1M | 42% |
| Premium Ingredients | $66.1M | 20% |
| Segment Reporting Reconciling Item Other | $63.2M | 19% |
| Other | $63.1M | 19% |
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.
