vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aterian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.6× ECB Bancorp, Inc.). ECB Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.3% vs -52.5%, a 79.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECB Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.8% vs -38.5%). ECB Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.0M vs $-1.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ECB Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.8% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (MD) is a US-based bank holding company. It offers a full suite of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, commercial financing and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individuals and small-to-mid enterprises across local markets in Maryland.
ATER vs ECBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 36.7% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | 27.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 33.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $791.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $621.0K |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | 36.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $82.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $171.9M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $82.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $191.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $143.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $309.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $114.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $108.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $109.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $171.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $169.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $168.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $168.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $165.8M |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 94.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-631.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $861.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $-429.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-649.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | $-449.0K |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | 94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 86.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -7.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
ECBK
Segment breakdown not available.
