vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($310.0K vs $290.0K, roughly 1.1× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -9420.0%, a 8656.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-18.9M).
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
AVR vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
