vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BANCFIRST CORP (BANF) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $181.0M, roughly 1.6× BANCFIRST CORP). BANCFIRST CORP runs the higher net margin — 32.9% vs 15.3%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BANCFIRST CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -29.1%). BANCFIRST CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($237.0M vs $-57.2M).
BancFirst Corporation is an Oklahoma-based financial services holding company. The company operates three subsidiary banks, BancFirst, an Oklahoma state-chartered bank; and Pegasus Bank and Worthington Bank, both Texas state-chartered banks.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
BANF vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.0M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $59.5M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.6% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 32.9% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.75 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.0M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $163.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $59.5M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 41.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.75 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.85 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.66 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $285.3M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $237.0M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 130.9% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.7% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.79× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $430.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $285.3M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $237.0M | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 130.9% | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 137.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.79× | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
