vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BCB BANCORP INC (BCBP) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $26.2M, roughly 1.6× BCB BANCORP INC). BCB BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.9M vs $7.4M).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
BCBP vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.2M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-12.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -71.9% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 13.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -467.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -71.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $304.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.9M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 133.3% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 133.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 287.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 166.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
