vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TopBuild Corp (BLD) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TopBuild Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 7.0%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TopBuild Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 1.7%). TopBuild Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($159.4M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, TopBuild Corp's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
HashiCorp, Inc. is an American software company with a freemium business model based in San Francisco, California. HashiCorp provides tools and products that enable developers, operators and security professionals to provision, secure, run and connect cloud-computing infrastructure. It was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar. The company name HashiCorp is a portmanteau of co-founder last name Hashimoto and Corporation.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
BLD vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $104.5M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.6% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $104.5M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.6M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.4M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.5M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $152.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.3% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.04 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.32 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.23 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.07 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.65 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.78 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.79 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $184.7M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.7M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $842.5M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $308.8M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.3M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $257.3M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $968.8M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.52× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $176.7M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $159.4M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.69× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $696.9M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $176.7M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.7M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.2M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.7M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.4M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.8M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.2M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.2M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.7M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.8M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.3M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.9M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.69× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLD
| Distribution Segment | $755.4M | 51% |
| Residential | $557.9M | 38% |
| All Other Products | $91.9M | 6% |
| Glass And Windows | $51.5M | 3% |
| Rain Gutters | $27.1M | 2% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
