vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd (CCTG) and ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. (OESX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.1M vs $9.2M, roughly 2.3× CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd). ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -8.1%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-1.2M).
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. is an American LED lighting and intelligent controls enterprise, founded in Plymouth, Wisconsin, and headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin
CCTG vs OESX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $-744.3K | $160.0K |
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 1.8% |
| Net Margin | -8.1% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 110.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $160.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-581.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-744.3K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $464.4K | $9.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.8M | $11.8M |
| Total Assets | $17.4M | $48.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 0.83× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $464.4K | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-897.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $-1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.6% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -5.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-905.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-897.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-515.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-699.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $498.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $175.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-570.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $493.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCTG
Segment breakdown not available.
OESX
| Lighting Product And Installation | $11.9M | 56% |
| Electric Vehicle Charging Systems | $4.7M | 22% |
| Maintenance Services | $4.4M | 21% |
