vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd (CCTG) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $9.2M, roughly 27.4× CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd). CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -8.1% vs -125.2%, a 117.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.2M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
CCTG vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $-744.3K | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | -8.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 25 | — | $252.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $-316.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-744.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.8% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | -114.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | -125.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $464.4K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.8M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $17.4M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $464.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.6% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCTG
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |