vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Dole plc (DOLE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.0× Celanese Corp). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs 0.2%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dole plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $66.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Dole plc's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
CE vs DOLE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 6.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 1.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -64.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $70.1M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 9.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $321.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $321.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $261.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $266.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $245.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $87.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $66.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 17.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $13.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-78.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $40.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $66.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-131.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-53.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | -0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
DOLE
Segment breakdown not available.
