vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC (SAH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.7× Celanese Corp). SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC runs the higher net margin — 1.6% vs 0.6%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.0% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC's revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Sonic Automotive is a Fortune 500 company based in Charlotte, North Carolina, and is the fifth largest automotive retailer in the United States as measured by total revenues. The company was founded by O Bruton Smith and completed its initial public offering on the NYSE in 1997.
CE vs SAH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $60.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $70.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.79 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $67.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $944.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $66.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $136.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $87.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $-136.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $-195.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $134.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $150.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $-245.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-185.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | -3.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
SAH
| Retail new vehicles | $1.6B | 44% |
| Used vehicles | $1.3B | 34% |
| Parts, service and collision repair | $516.6M | 14% |
| Finance, insurance and other, net | $202.4M | 5% |
| Wholesale vehicles | $71.8M | 2% |
| Fleet new vehicles | $20.7M | 1% |