vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Confluent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.8M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.9× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -25.2%, a 50.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Confluent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.5% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $41.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Confluent, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Confluent, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Confluent was founded by Jay Kreps, Jun Rao and Neha Narkhede on September 23, 2014, in order to commercialize an open-source streaming platform Apache Kafka, created by the same founders while working at LinkedIn in 2008 as a B2B infrastructure company. Confluent's products are the Confluent Cloud, Confluent Platform, Connectors, Apache Flink, Stream Governance and Confluent Hub.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
CFLT vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.8M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-79.2M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -31.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -25.2% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.0% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $314.8M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.1M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.2M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.0M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-79.2M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-66.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-67.6M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-89.9M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-93.0M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 74.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -37.4% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.3% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -25.2% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.8% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $347.2M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $347.2M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $278.6M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.0M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $322.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.3M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.4M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $961.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $934.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $845.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.1M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.7M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $60.7M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.8M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.2M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.0M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $41.7M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.2M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.1M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.0% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CFLT
| Confluent Cloud | $169.4M | 54% |
| Post Contract Customer Support | $93.8M | 30% |
| License | $38.4M | 12% |
| Services | $13.2M | 4% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.