vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Confluent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.8M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.9× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -25.2%, a 50.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Confluent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.5% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $41.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Confluent, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 4.9%).

Confluent, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Confluent was founded by Jay Kreps, Jun Rao and Neha Narkhede on September 23, 2014, in order to commercialize an open-source streaming platform Apache Kafka, created by the same founders while working at LinkedIn in 2008 as a B2B infrastructure company. Confluent's products are the Confluent Cloud, Confluent Platform, Connectors, Apache Flink, Stream Governance and Confluent Hub.

National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.

CFLT vs PRK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CFLT
CFLT
1.9× larger
CFLT
$314.8M
$168.3M
PRK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CFLT
CFLT
+18.3% gap
CFLT
20.5%
2.2%
PRK
Higher net margin
PRK
PRK
50.5% more per $
PRK
25.3%
-25.2%
CFLT
More free cash flow
PRK
PRK
$150.3M more FCF
PRK
$191.9M
$41.7M
CFLT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CFLT
CFLT
Annualised
CFLT
20.4%
4.9%
PRK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Revenue
$314.8M
$168.3M
Net Profit
$-79.2M
$42.6M
Gross Margin
74.7%
Operating Margin
-31.5%
Net Margin
-25.2%
25.3%
Revenue YoY
20.5%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
10.0%
10.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.23
$2.62

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$314.8M
$168.3M
Q3 25
$298.5M
$169.5M
Q2 25
$282.3M
$168.7M
Q1 25
$271.1M
$157.9M
Q4 24
$261.2M
$164.7M
Q3 24
$250.2M
$170.3M
Q2 24
$235.0M
$157.7M
Q1 24
$217.2M
$152.8M
Net Profit
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-79.2M
$42.6M
Q3 25
$-66.5M
$47.2M
Q2 25
$-82.0M
$48.1M
Q1 25
$-67.6M
$42.2M
Q4 24
$-88.1M
$38.6M
Q3 24
$-74.1M
$38.2M
Q2 24
$-89.9M
$39.4M
Q1 24
$-93.0M
$35.2M
Gross Margin
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
74.7%
Q3 25
74.2%
Q2 25
73.7%
Q1 25
74.5%
Q4 24
74.1%
Q3 24
74.5%
Q2 24
72.3%
Q1 24
71.8%
Operating Margin
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
-31.5%
Q3 25
-27.9%
34.3%
Q2 25
-34.2%
35.2%
Q1 25
-37.3%
32.4%
Q4 24
-40.5%
Q3 24
-37.4%
27.4%
Q2 24
-46.1%
30.6%
Q1 24
-51.3%
27.8%
Net Margin
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
-25.2%
25.3%
Q3 25
-22.3%
27.8%
Q2 25
-29.0%
28.5%
Q1 25
-24.9%
26.7%
Q4 24
-33.7%
23.5%
Q3 24
-29.6%
22.4%
Q2 24
-38.3%
25.0%
Q1 24
-42.8%
23.0%
EPS (diluted)
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-0.23
$2.62
Q3 25
$-0.19
$2.92
Q2 25
$-0.24
$2.97
Q1 25
$-0.20
$2.60
Q4 24
$-0.26
$2.38
Q3 24
$-0.23
$2.35
Q2 24
$-0.28
$2.42
Q1 24
$-0.30
$2.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$347.2M
$233.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$1.4B
Total Assets
$3.0B
$9.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.94×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$347.2M
$233.5M
Q3 25
$298.5M
$218.9M
Q2 25
$295.6M
$193.1M
Q1 25
$278.6M
$237.6M
Q4 24
$386.0M
$160.6M
Q3 24
$322.6M
$201.7M
Q2 24
$311.3M
$261.5M
Q1 24
$336.4M
$306.1M
Total Debt
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$961.2M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$934.3M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$873.9M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$845.2M
$1.2B
Total Assets
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$3.0B
$9.8B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$9.9B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$9.9B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$9.9B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$9.8B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$9.9B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$9.9B
Q1 24
$2.4B
$9.9B
Debt / Equity
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
0.94×
Q3 25
0.98×
Q2 25
1.03×
Q1 25
1.07×
Q4 24
1.14×
Q3 24
1.17×
Q2 24
1.25×
Q1 24
1.29×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$42.1M
$198.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$41.7M
$191.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.2%
114.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.65×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$60.7M
$328.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$42.1M
$198.3M
Q3 25
$30.8M
$52.6M
Q2 25
$18.1M
$49.7M
Q1 25
$-26.8M
$37.9M
Q4 24
$35.2M
$178.8M
Q3 24
$15.6M
$43.8M
Q2 24
$8.6M
$50.9M
Q1 24
$-26.0M
$35.0M
Free Cash Flow
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$41.7M
$191.9M
Q3 25
$30.0M
$51.1M
Q2 25
$17.2M
$48.4M
Q1 25
$-28.2M
$36.8M
Q4 24
$34.5M
$169.7M
Q3 24
$15.0M
$41.7M
Q2 24
$7.5M
$49.0M
Q1 24
$-26.1M
$31.9M
FCF Margin
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
13.2%
114.1%
Q3 25
10.0%
30.1%
Q2 25
6.1%
28.7%
Q1 25
-10.4%
23.3%
Q4 24
13.2%
103.0%
Q3 24
6.0%
24.5%
Q2 24
3.2%
31.1%
Q1 24
-12.0%
20.8%
Capex Intensity
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
0.1%
3.8%
Q3 25
0.3%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.3%
0.8%
Q1 25
0.5%
0.7%
Q4 24
0.3%
5.6%
Q3 24
0.2%
1.2%
Q2 24
0.5%
1.2%
Q1 24
0.1%
2.1%
Cash Conversion
CFLT
CFLT
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
4.65×
Q3 25
1.11×
Q2 25
1.03×
Q1 25
0.90×
Q4 24
4.63×
Q3 24
1.14×
Q2 24
1.29×
Q1 24
0.99×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CFLT
CFLT

Confluent Cloud$169.4M54%
Post Contract Customer Support$93.8M30%
License$38.4M12%
Services$13.2M4%

PRK
PRK

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons