vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (CM) and SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC (SAH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.7× SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC). CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE runs the higher net margin — 36.9% vs 1.6%, a 35.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Imperial Bank of Canada was a Canadian bank that operated from 1873 to 1961. In 1961, Imperial merged with the Canadian Bank of Commerce to become the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Sonic Automotive is a Fortune 500 company based in Charlotte, North Carolina, and is the fifth largest automotive retailer in the United States as measured by total revenues. The company was founded by O Bruton Smith and completed its initial public offering on the NYSE in 1997.
CM vs SAH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $2.3B | $60.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 36.9% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $60.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.79 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $826.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9B | $89.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $67.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $47.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $944.7M |
| Q1 26 | $826.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $804.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $795.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $667.2M | $136.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-136.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-195.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $134.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $150.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-245.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-185.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.80× | 3.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CM
Segment breakdown not available.
SAH
| Retail new vehicles | $1.6B | 44% |
| Used vehicles | $1.3B | 34% |
| Parts, service and collision repair | $516.6M | 14% |
| Finance, insurance and other, net | $202.4M | 5% |
| Wholesale vehicles | $71.8M | 2% |
| Fleet new vehicles | $20.7M | 1% |