vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($838.0M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.6× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 6.1%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 14.5%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
CMA vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $425.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | $394.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | $-14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $814.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $856.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $262.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $252.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 3.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | $-37.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-42.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMA
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
