vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Creative Media & Community Trust Corp (CMCT) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Creative Media & Community Trust Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($28.5M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.9× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -125.8%, a 123.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -8.5%).
Creative Media & Community Trust Corp is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust operating two core segments: it owns, manages and develops creative media facilities including professional film and TV production studios, plus community-focused assets such as affordable housing, neighborhood healthcare centers and local commercial spaces, serving media operators and local communities nationwide.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
CMCT vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $28.5M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $-11.4M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -125.6% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | -125.8% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.6% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.89 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.5M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.0M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-796.0K | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -125.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -47.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.3% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -128.8% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -125.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -47.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -129.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.89 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.52 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.94 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.73 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.71 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-305.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-98.64 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.4M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $509.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.4M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $859.2M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.3M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $509.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $527.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $512.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $485.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $265.4M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $281.9M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $287.1M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $304.5M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.0M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.1M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $859.2M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.8M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $885.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $882.3M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $889.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $868.0M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.2M | $64.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.38× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCT
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
