vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.5× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 5.6%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -9.6%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
COCO vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $318.4M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $38.7M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 22.5% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | $359.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $706.1M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $-61.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $-62.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | -1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
