vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP (HWC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.0M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.6× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 16.1%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs -19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -9.4%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
Hancock Whitney Corp. is an American bank holding company headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi. It operates 237 branches in Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. The bank is the official bank of the New Orleans Saints and issues the official debit card. The bank is also the official bank of LSU Athletics and the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns, being the exclusive provider of credit cards for the LSU Tigers, as well as debit cards for both athletic brands.
COCO vs HWC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $295.0M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | -19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | -60.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $389.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $385.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $364.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $364.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $367.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $359.6M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 40.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $1.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $1.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $223.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $35.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $210.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $210.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $236.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.4M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | $35.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $35.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $35.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $35.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $34.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $35.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $35.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $35.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
HWC
Segment breakdown not available.
