vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and INDEPENDENT BANK CORP (INDB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INDEPENDENT BANK CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.5M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.2× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). INDEPENDENT BANK CORP runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs 17.0%, a 18.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INDEPENDENT BANK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (46.9% vs 37.3%). Over the past eight quarters, INDEPENDENT BANK CORP's revenue compounded faster (24.3% CAGR vs 11.7%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
Independent Bank is a bank headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The bank has 62 branches, all of which are in Michigan.
COCO vs INDB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $212.5M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $75.3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 35.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 46.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 50.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $1.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $212.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $203.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $147.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $145.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $144.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $141.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $137.9M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $51.3M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 37.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $24.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $24.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $25.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $20.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $19.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $19.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $19.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $78.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $75.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 35.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $239.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $106.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $70.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $65.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $49.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $102.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $64.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $61.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 44.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 2.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 0.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
INDB
Segment breakdown not available.
