vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Jefferson Capital, Inc. (JCAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vita Coco Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($179.8M vs $150.8M, roughly 1.2× Jefferson Capital, Inc.). Jefferson Capital, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs 17.0%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
GE Capital was the financial services division of General Electric. Its various units were sold between 2013 and 2021, including the notable spin-off of the North American consumer finance division as Synchrony Financial. Ultimately, only one division of the company remained, GE Energy Financial Services, which was transferred to GE Vernova when General Electric was broken up.
COCO vs JCAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $150.8M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $38.4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 46.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 25.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $150.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $47.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 56.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $16.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $42.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $437.4M |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $437.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $410.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $63.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $63.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $130.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 85.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
JCAP
| United States Segment | $108.1M | 72% |
| Other | $35.8M | 24% |
| United Kingdom Segment | $6.9M | 5% |
