vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and OFG BANCORP (OFG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OFG BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.3M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.0× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). OFG BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 17.0%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 2.8%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
OFG Bancorp, founded in 1964, is the financial holding company for Oriental Bank, located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. OFG offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, lending and wealth management products, services and technology, primarily in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands through its principal subsidiaries: Oriental Bank, Oriental Financial Services LLC, and Oriental Insurance LLC. Its headquarters are located at Oriental Center, 254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, PR 00918....
COCO vs OFG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $184.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $55.9M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 25.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 11.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $1.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $184.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $186.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $178.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $174.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $179.8M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $51.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $51.1M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 39.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $1.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $1.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $740.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $851.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | $710.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $591.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $680.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | $740.4M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $12.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $11.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $11.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $11.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $217.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $199.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 108.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $345.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $35.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $252.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $95.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $78.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $90.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 108.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 5.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
OFG
Segment breakdown not available.
