vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Dole plc (DOLE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.0× CONSTELLIUM SE). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 0.2%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. CONSTELLIUM SE produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.0M vs $66.5M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
CSTM vs DOLE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 6.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 1.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -64.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $38.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $321.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $321.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $323.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $266.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $245.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $223.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $87.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $66.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 17.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $13.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-78.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $40.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-35.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $80.4M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $66.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-131.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $64.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 17.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 1.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | -2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
DOLE
Segment breakdown not available.
