vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITIUS ONCOLOGY, INC. (CTOR) and Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $3.9M, roughly 1.0× CITIUS ONCOLOGY, INC.).
Citius Oncology, Inc. is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative targeted therapies for cancer patients. Its core pipeline covers treatments addressing unmet medical needs in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, primarily serving North American and global oncology care markets.
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
CTOR vs EDBL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 80.0% | -29.0% |
| Operating Margin | -133.2% | -138.6% |
| Net Margin | -140.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-109.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 80.0% | -29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -133.2% | -138.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -126.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -114.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -107.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -70.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -57.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -123.3% |
| Q4 25 | -140.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -143.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -128.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -122.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -79.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -127.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-109.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-330.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-341.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.4M | $12.5M |
| Total Assets | $110.0M | $20.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $511.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $110.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.4M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -66.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-7.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -66.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -110.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -125.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -110.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTOR
Segment breakdown not available.
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
