vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.9× CaliberCos Inc.). Marygold Companies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.5% vs -188.3%, a 180.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marygold Companies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Marygold Companies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
CWD vs MGLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $7.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $-576.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -8.3% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | -7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | -4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | 67.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $-576.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $-356.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-529.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 70.5% |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | -21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $11.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $22.7M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $27.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | $35.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $33.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $-908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-533.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | $-770.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | $-893.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-658.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-562.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-776.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-940.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWD
Segment breakdown not available.
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
