vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) and Honest Company, Inc. (HNST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.8M vs $78.1M, roughly 1.6× Honest Company, Inc.). On growth, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3040.1% vs -19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.9% CAGR vs -8.4%).
The Dime Community Bank, originally known as the Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, is a local, FDIC-insured bank headquartered in Hauppauge, New York. Founded in 1864, the bank was originally based in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, and continues to operate with a strong market presence in this area. In 2017, Dime moved its headquarters to Brooklyn Heights. On Monday, February 1, 2021, Bridge Bancorp Inc. and Dime Community Bancshares successfully closed on a merger of ...
The Honest Company, Inc. is an American digital-first consumer goods company, based in Los Angeles and founded by actress Jessica Alba, Christopher Gavigan, and Brian Lee. The company had $319 million in 2021 sales, and was valued at roughly $550 million as of February 2022. Carla Vernón, Chief Executive Officer, is one of the first Afro-Latina CEOs of a U.S. publicly traded company. The Honest Company has raised multiple rounds of venture capital, and went public via an initial public offeri...
DCOM vs HNST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.8M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.6% |
| Operating Margin | 38.6% | 56.6% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 3040.1% | -19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $78.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.8M | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.6M | $92.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.7M | $93.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.8M | $97.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $99.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $93.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7M | $758.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-809.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $165.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | -27.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -433.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $90.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $169.1M |
| Total Assets | $15.3B | $214.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $89.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $190.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $187.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $180.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $129.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.3B | $225.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5B | $241.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $249.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1B | $265.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4B | $247.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | $200.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $186.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $186.6M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | $-504.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $-745.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.1M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $-826.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.9% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.88× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | -0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.05× | -0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.50× | 91.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
