vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST (DHC) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $379.6M, roughly 1.6× DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -5.6%, a 19.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -0.0%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $-166.4M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
DHC vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $379.6M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $379.6M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.7M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.7M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.6M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.6M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.8M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-164.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.7M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.9M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-86.3M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | -12.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -43.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.7% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.68 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.4M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.8M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.6M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.6M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.6M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.1M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.6M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-166.4M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -43.8% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-280.3M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-19.6M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.3M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.6M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-166.4M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.8M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.5M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.1M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.1M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | -43.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHC
| Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Segment | $323.4M | 85% |
| Rental Income | $56.2M | 15% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.