vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.2× Eastman Chemical Company). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.2%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dole plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Dole plc's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
DOLE vs EMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $105.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | -13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | -42.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $180.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $230.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $1.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $1.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $566.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $6.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $14.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $502.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $402.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $233.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | $-167.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $540.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | $-314.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $361.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $252.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 8.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | -0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 2.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.