vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vertiv Holdings Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.2× Dole plc). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 0.2%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 10.5%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $66.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 3.2%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.
DOLE vs VRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $390.1M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 30.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | 137.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $164.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $178.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 38.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $4.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $908.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $579.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $8.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | $652.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | $2.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $978.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $508.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $322.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | $303.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $425.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $378.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $378.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $652.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $885.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $463.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | $266.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $364.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $344.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | 1.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
