vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dole plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.3× Weyerhaeuser). Weyerhaeuser runs the higher net margin — 9.0% vs 0.2%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Weyerhaeuser posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs 10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dole plc's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -5.6%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
The Weyerhaeuser Company is an American timberland company which owns approximately 10,400,000 acres of timberlands in the U.S., and manages an additional 14,000,000 acres of timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. The company has manufactured wood products for over a century. It operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
DOLE vs WY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $156.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 14.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 9.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | 110.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $156.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $173.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $299.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $372.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $9.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $16.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $464.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $592.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $560.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $684.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $877.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $997.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $372.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $10.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-114.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | $70.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $432.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $388.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $226.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $423.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 4.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 8.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 2.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
