vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and Scilex Holding Co (SCLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Scilex Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.2× Edible Garden AG Inc). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -67.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs -33.6%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Scilex Holding Co is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing innovative non-opioid pain management therapies for acute and chronic pain segments. It primarily serves the US market, offering prescription and over-the-counter pain relief solutions for patients and healthcare providers.
EDBL vs SCLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $4.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-46.1M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -2317.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -961.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -67.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -613.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-4.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-257.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-24.4M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 45.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 68.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 66.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 72.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -2317.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -1766.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -207.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -557.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -190.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -138.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -95.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -179.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -961.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -2441.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -445.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -521.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | -43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -229.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -224.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-4.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-22.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-7.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-2.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $8.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-7.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-8.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $-207.8M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $365.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $878.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $77.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $-207.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $-176.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-249.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-211.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-192.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-211.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $-214.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $-189.8M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $365.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $275.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $83.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $93.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $100.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $91.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
SCLX
Segment breakdown not available.
