vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. (VEEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $3.0M, roughly 1.4× Twin Vee PowerCats, Co.). On growth, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (60.4% vs 6.6%). Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.9M vs $-2.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs -24.3%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Twin Vee PowerCats Co. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance recreational power catamaran boats. The company offers a diverse lineup of catamaran models suited for leisure cruising, fishing, water sports, and commercial marine use, serving customers primarily across North America, with a growing distribution network in global coastal markets.
EDBL vs VEEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -87.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 60.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -119.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | -57.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -87.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -107.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -48.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -80.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | -62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -44.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $-3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-3.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | $499.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $13.5M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $16.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $499.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.9K |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | -62.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | $-9.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-745.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-482.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | -62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -91.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | -30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | -71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | -192.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | -128.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | -51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | -70.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 37.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
VEEE
Segment breakdown not available.
