vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edison International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $3.9B, roughly 1.3× Ulta Beauty). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 9.1%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ulta Beauty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs 30.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 4.7%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
EIX vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $356.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 9.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | $8.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $305.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $313.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $6.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $6.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $494.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | $62.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $494.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $454.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | $524.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | 11.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $68.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
ULTA
Segment breakdown not available.
