vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dole plc (DOLE) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ulta Beauty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.3× Dole plc). Ulta Beauty runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 0.2%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ulta Beauty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 10.5%). Dole plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.5M vs $-81.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Ulta Beauty's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 3.2%).
Dole plc is an Irish-American agricultural multinational corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company is among the world's largest producers of fruit and vegetables, operating with 38,500 full-time and seasonal employees who supply some 300 products in 75 countries. Dole reported 2021 revenues of $6.5 billion.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
DOLE vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $230.9M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.6% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $5.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $305.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $313.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.1M | $394.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.2% | 37.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $6.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $6.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.74 | $8.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $321.0M | $204.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.1M | $454.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.4M | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.8M | $524.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $245.5M | $766.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $5.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | $5.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.5M | $-81.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.9% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 17.12× | 0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.7M | $-92.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-78.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $68.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.2M | $994.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 28.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.12× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.01× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.50× | 2.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.